Constitutional Amendment Bill may pose threat to Odisha's interests, says Naveen Patnaik in letter to all MPs of state

Leader of Opposition and BJD president Naveen Patnaik has written to all Members of Parliament (MPs) from Odisha, warning that the proposed 131st Constitutional Amendment Bill could pose a serious threat to the state’s political and economic interests.

In his letter, Patnaik said while he strongly supports women’s empowerment and reservation, the current proposal linking women’s reservation with delimitation raises concerns that go beyond its stated objective.

Patnaik cautioned that the delimitation exercise could reduce Odisha’s representation in the Lok Sabha. According to the letter, the state’s share may drop from 3.9 per cent to 3.4 per cent, placing it among the top states losing representation.
He argued that such a reduction would weaken Odisha’s voice in national decision-making and affect its ability to push for state-specific needs such as disaster management, tribal welfare and regional development. He described the issue as one of preserving the federal structure rather than just politics.

The BJD chief also highlighted the emotional and cultural implications of reduced representation.He said parliamentary presence is not just about numbers but also about identity, pride and ensuring that Odisha’s history, language and aspirations are heard at the national level.

He warned that any move diminishing the state’s voice could create a sense of marginalisation among its people.

Patnaik expressed concern that linking women’s reservation with delimitation could favour more populous states, potentially skewing the allocation of central resources. He said this may impact Odisha’s share in fiscal transfers, infrastructure investments and development priorities.

The letter noted that despite contributing significantly to national revenue, Odisha has often faced what he termed “discriminatory treatment,” including denial of special status.

Urging MPs to rise above party lines, Patnaik called for careful consideration of the amendment’s broader implications. He suggested that women’s reservation should be decoupled from delimitation if necessary.
source;sambadenglish.com